Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3.1vsGemini 1.5 Pro
Updated Aug 2025

DeepSeek V3.1vsGemini 1.5 Pro

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper than Gemini 1.5 Pro at $0.2/M vs $3.5/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input price$0.2/M tokens$3.5/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$10.5/M tokens
Context window164K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2024
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Gemini 1.5 ProRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

DeepSeek V3.1 costs 13x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.1
Input
$0.20
18× cheaper
Output
$0.80
13× cheaper
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input
$3.50
Output
$10.50

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper on both: 18× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V3.18 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.25 in·$0.95 out·164k·99.9% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$1.00 out·131k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.27 in·$1.00 out·164k·97.2% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$0.95 out·131k·99.3% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.55 in·$1.65 out·161k·100% upMMara$0.60 in·$1.70 out·131k·95% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
SSambaNovafp8$0.65 in·$1.50 out·131k·96.3% upGoogle Vertex AIdegraded$0.60 in·$1.70 out·164k·0% up
Gemini 1.5 Pro

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
66%

DeepSeek V3.1 uses 2.2x more emoji

DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
53%Vocabulary61%
16wSentence Length15w
0.41Hedging0.80
4.3Bold3.7
3.8Lists3.3
0.02Emoji0.00
0.40Headings0.08
0.20Transitions0.09
Based on 25 + 8 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Gemini 1.5 Pro logoOx Alpha logo
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.1 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3New provider
DeepSeek V3.1 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorNew provider
DeepSeek V3.1 logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashCross-provider
Gemini 1.5 Pro logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BNew provider
Gemini 1.5 Pro logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 27BNew provider
Gemini 1.5 Pro logoQwen3.5 35B A3B logo
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 35B A3BNew provider
Gemini 1.5 Pro logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed