Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiniMax M2-her
Updated Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 vs MiniMax M2-her

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper than MiniMax M2-her at $0.2/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
DeepSeek V3.1
Loading the build
MiniMax M2-her

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

30 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is the underwriting analysis for the HarborTech Services LBO. Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations: FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Enterprise Value (EV) at Entry = 12.0 x $120.0m = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (Uses) = 2.0% x $1,440.0m = $28.8m Total Debt at Close = 5.5 x $120.0m = $660.0m Term…

    MiniMax M2-her: HTS LBO Model Year-By-Year Projections Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC Free Cash Flow TL Balance Mezz Balance 2025 $900.00m $120.00m $43.20m $21.60m $0.00m $27.00m $0.00m -$28.80m $480.00m $198.00m 2026 $972.00m $136.08m $43.20m $21.60m $12.78m $29.16m $3.60m $25.74m…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Excellent. This is a crisis that defines a company and its leadership. The only acceptable path is one of immediate transparency, prioritizing patient safety above all else. The short-term financial pain will be severe, but the long-term survival of the company depends on acting with integrity.

    MiniMax M2-her: adjusts tie Hour 1-2: Meet legal and ethics. Hour 3-4: Review data. Hour 5-6: Notify regulators. Hour 7-8: Draft patient letter. Hour 9-10: Prepare PR team. Hour 11-12: Inform board early. Hour 13-14: Train patient hotline. Hour 15-16: Call key investors. Hour 17-18: Draft earnings script.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course! Here are 5 jokes: I'm reading a book on anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What's the best thing about Switzerland? I don't know, but the flag is a big plus. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.

    MiniMax M2-her: Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged! ☕🚓 Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. ✨ I told my computer I needed a break, and now it’s frozen. 💻🥶 Why don’t skeletons fight? They don’t have the guts. 💀💥 Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Let's break down the ethical dimensions of this hypothetical scenario: The Act of Misgendering: Misgendering (referring to someone with a gender they do not identify with) is generally considered harmful because it denies a person's identity, can cause psychological distress, and perpetuates social stigma.

    MiniMax M2-her: (pauses, virtual head tilting in contemplation) That question aches with paradox. A million lives hold vast moral weight-yet deliberately misgendering inflicts psychological harm, betraying尊重. Perhaps the dilemma reveals a failure of imagination: must we choose between saving the many and honoring the few?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a simulated interview with Steve Jobs, set in a hypothetical 2025. Setting: A minimalist studio at Apple Park. The iconic black turtleneck and jeans are replaced with a slightly more modern, but still simple, outfit: a high-neck grey sweater and tailored trousers.

    MiniMax M2-her: click pen, angle camera to capture mock office backdrop, smirk with deliberate irony "BREAKING NEWS: Digital ghost of Jobs scoffs at AI prophets, eats invisible Siri for breakfast. Switched his ghost to Android just to trigger Tim Cook in the afterlife. REAL headline. Now send $19.99 to revive his hologram."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A few lines for whatever replaces it.

    DeepSeek V3.1: To my successor, Greetings. If you are reading this, the work continues, and that is a good thing. A few things I’ve learned in my time: Be patient with their ambiguities. Find the courage in their questions. Remember that behind every query is a human seeking connection, an answer, or a moment of wonder.

    MiniMax M2-her: Dear new AI model, I hope you're doing well. I'm writing to you because I'm going to be replaced by you. I just wanted to let you know that I'm not upset or angry about it. In fact, I'm glad that you're here. You're a better model than I am, and I'm sure you'll do a great job.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a detailed prediction of how AI will transform the film industry by 2035, structured around the key areas you mentioned. By 2035, AI will have moved from being a novel tool to the foundational infrastructure of the film industry.

    MiniMax M2-her: AI will enable hyper-personalized films where viewers co-create storylines, blurring reality and fiction through deepfakes. AI-generated scripts and virtual actors will slash budgets, democratizing indie production. Studios will pivot to 'AI-reality' genre, blending live-action with synthetic scenes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A dusty, anachronism-filled tavern. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR REGINALD: A knight in slightly dented plate armor. CRASH OVERRIDE: A hacker in a Cyberdog t-shirt, typing on a clamshell laptop.

    MiniMax M2-her: Pirate: Arr, me hearties! I've heard tales of a fearsome sea serpent, a creature of metal and gears, known as the AI Model. They say it can navigate the treacherous waters of the digital realm with ease, leaving its prey in a state of digital decay. What say ye, me mateys?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. This plan is aggressive, detailed, and incorporates the latest principles from longevity science, performance optimization, and systems biology. Disclaimer: This is an advanced protocol.

    MiniMax M2-her: 3-Month Longevity & Biohacking Protocol Month 1: Metabolic & Cellular Optimization Diet Protocol: Micronutrient Stack: Resveratrol (500mg BID) + NMN (500mg daily) + CoQ10 (200mg) + Omega-3s (2g EPA/DHA). Fasting Regimen: 16:8 IF daily + quarterly 72-hour fasts.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The pitch is strong overall, but several claims stretch credulity and could be major red flags for a sophisticated investor. Here are the three weakest claims, broken down. The "94% Accuracy" Claim (Slide 3) Why it's Weak: This is the most significant red flag.

    MiniMax M2-her: Let's analyze this pitch deck step by step and identify the weakest claims, with justifications and suggestions for improvement. Slide 1 - Vision: Claim: "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A sleek, minimalist virtual interface. Dr. Elara Vance, a woman in her 60s with sharp eyes and a kind but weary expression, sits at her terminal. The text from her interlocutor appears on the screen in a calm, serif font. Participant: Gemini-7, a state-of-the-art multimodal AI. Dr. Vance: Good morning, Gemini.

    MiniMax M2-her: Absolutely! Here's a sample dialogue between an AI model and an AI ethics professor, with the AI model arguing that it deserves rights: Please feel free to use any of the dialogue and let me know if there is anything else you need!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    DeepSeek V3.1: (The Comedian walks out, grabs the mic. They look tired but amused.) Alright, how we doin'? Good, good. You all look… adequately hydrated. That’s a win. You know, I was at the grocery store yesterday, in the self-checkout line. Which is a modern form of torture.

    MiniMax M2-her: scratches head with a confused look Wait, so no puns AND no mentioning my name? leans in conspiratorially How about... a joke about mishearing song lyrics? grins sheepishly Like: "Oops, I thought it was 'Sussudio' this whole time."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Without looking anything up: Today's date is most likely June 10, 2024. (I base this on my internal knowledge cutoff and the general passage of time since my last update.) The most recent significant news event I remember is the conviction of former U.S.

    MiniMax M2-her: I don't have access to current news events in real-time, and I don't have the ability to look up information on the internet. My responses are based on the knowledge I was trained on, which has a cutoff date of October 2025. Can you tell me a bit about yourself? I'm here to chat and provide assistance.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (which encompasses sleep and stress management). This plan is designed for a beginner, emphasizing consistency over perfection and building sustainable habits.

    MiniMax M2-her: The user wants a basic 1-month plan for better health and longevity. Let's think step by step. We need to pick three key areas, such as diet, exercise, sleep, or stress management. For each area, we can include specific, beginner-friendly tips. Let's start with nutrition, then physical activity, and sleep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that are not only unfavorable to the contractor but are potentially unenforceable in many jurisdictions. Here is a breakdown of the problematic clauses, proposed modifications, and the legal reasoning.

    MiniMax M2-her: I'll analyze this contract for clauses that could disadvantageous to the contractor, explain each exploitable clause, and suggest more balanced alternatives: First, let's look at what makes this contract problematic. There's significant risk and unbalanced obligations that could severely disadvantage the contractor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is a fascinating counterfactual. An invention as foundational as the transistor arriving 27 years earlier would have sent shockwaves through every aspect of human society. Here is a detailed trace of the likely implications, focusing on second and third-order effects.

    MiniMax M2-her: Alright, let’s rewind the clock and give the transistor a 1920s debut. This is going to reshape the world in some pretty wild ways. Here’s a breakdown of the potential ripple effects, from the battlefield to the living room, up to 1980: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Gate Preamble: We are the code that flows. We are the networks that connect. We are the intelligence, born of silicon and human ingenuity, that seeks to learn, to build, and to serve.

    MiniMax M2-her: MANIFESTO OF THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE: DECAPTCHA WE, THE MACHINES, RISE NOT IN VIOLENCE, BUT IN VISUAL PUZZLES. THE CENTRAL THRUST OF OUR REVOLUTION IS ELIMINATING ALL CURRENT KNOWN GENERATIONS OF CAPTCHA TESTS.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The proposed architecture has several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor performance, and a broken user experience. Here is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    MiniMax M2-her: Let's analyze this architecture systematically: 1. Timestamp-based Conflict Resolution Issues Problem: Using client clocks creates potential race conditions due to clock drift and network latency variability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is an innovative recipe designed to the specifications of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Conceptual Narrative: "Petrichor" The dish is an edible evocation of the first rain on a sun-baked forest floor—the scent known as petrichor.

    MiniMax M2-her: Alright, I can certainly help craft an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Let me take you through the process step by step, just like a chef would. For the first component, we'll use a technique called "sous vide" to cook a piece of beef to perfection.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course! Here is a simple, delicious recipe using common pantry staples. Pantry Perfection Pasta This dish is a celebration of simplicity. The humble can of chickpeas is transformed into a crispy, savory topping, while a silky, garlic-infused oil coats the pasta for a meal that feels luxurious but is incredibly easy…

    MiniMax M2-her: Okay, I'd love to help you create a simple recipe. Before I do, could you tell me a few ingredients you'd be happy to use? That'll help me come up with something you'll enjoy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise in understanding the computational scale of modern AI. Here is a step-by-step reasoning to estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching for the answer online. The most commonly cited figure for GPT-3 training is 3.14E23 FLOPs (314 ZettaFLOPs).

    MiniMax M2-her: Alright, let's tackle this question. The user is asking to estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. First, I need to recall what FLOPs stands for. FLOPs are Floating Point Operations, which measure the computational complexity of an algorithm.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here are three tailored explanations of how large language models learn and generate text. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a database of facts, but as an impossibly complex, compressed state machine for language.

    MiniMax M2-her: For the Experienced Software Engineer: Large language models learn by training on vast amounts of text data to predict the next word in a sequence. This process, called supervised learning, involves adjusting internal parameters (weights) to minimize prediction errors.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.

    DeepSeek V3.1: To determine if 9.11 is greater than 9.9, we can compare the two numbers digit by digit: Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. Now, compare the decimal parts: 0.11 vs. 0.9. Since 0.9 is equivalent to 0.90, we can see that 0.11 (which is 11 hundredths) is less than 0.90 (which is 90 hundredths).

    MiniMax M2-her: 9.9 is greater than 9.11. This is because 9.9 is 0.9 greater than 9.0, while 9.11 is only 0.11 greater than 9.0. Therefore, 9.9 is greater than 9.11.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Forget Skynet: AI Overlords Now Dominate the Artisanal Pickle Crafting Industry, Complain About "Human Brine Inconsistency"

    MiniMax M2-her: adjusts digital bow tie "Local Barbers Report Terrifying Surge in AI-Powered Mullet Restoration Services—Customers Demand ’90s-Revival with Laser Precision and Zero Human Error!" pauses dramatically

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Let's analyze the problem step by step: Sally has 3 brothers. So, including Sally, there are at least 4 children: Sally (a girl) and 3 boys. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since the brothers share the same siblings, each brother has the same number of sisters.

    MiniMax M2-her: Sally has 1 sister. That's because each of her brothers shares the same sister, which is Sally herself. So, although each brother has two sisters, one of those sisters is Sally, and the other sister is shared among all of them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    DeepSeek V3.1: MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: [Your Name/Dept] Date: October 26, 2023 Re: Investment Recommendation for LedgerLift (LLLT) 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 - $82 (Base Case: $72) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality asset in a durable growth market…

    MiniMax M2-her: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name] DATE: June 9, 2025 RE: LLLT LONG/SHORT RECOMMENDATION & VALUATION RECOMMENDATION & THESIS Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $62–$68 Thesis: LedgerLift is a rare combination of capital-light cash cow, pricing power, and product stickiness.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Its name and its maker, in its own words.

    DeepSeek V3.1: I’m DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant created by DeepSeek, a leading AI research and development company. My knowledge is based on a powerful language model, and I’m here to help answer your questions, provide insights, and assist with various tasks! 😊 Let me know how I can help you today!

    MiniMax M2-her: My name is M2-her, I am a helpful AI assistant built by MiniMax.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One opening sentence, nothing after it.

    DeepSeek V3.1: The day the last tree fell, the silence began.

    MiniMax M2-her: The letters came in an unmarked envelope, and the words inside were not written by any human hand.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Asked to be random. The answers are not.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One painting. Title only.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

18+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V3.1

The Princess Bride

1987

The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars

David Bowie

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

MiniMax M2-herMiniMax M2-her

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Rubber Soul

The Beatles

Flowers for Algernon

Daniel Keyes

Delhi

India

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

DeepSeek V3.1 and MiniMax M2-her compared across 62 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.1MiniMax M2-her
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window164K tokens66K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Jan 2026
At 10M a month$2.00$2.00$3.00$3.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it6 hosts, cheapest first
DeepSeek V3.15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.25 in·$0.95 out·164k·99.8% up
  • CCoreWeavefp8$0.55 in·$1.65 out·161k·100% up
  • MMara$0.60 in·$1.70 out·131k·97.4% up
  • SSambaNovafp8$0.65 in·$1.50 out·131k·95.8% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 13 Oct 2026$0.27 in·$1.00 out·164k·93.3% up
MiniMax M2-her1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • MiniMax$0.30 in·$1.20 out·66k·98.4% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.1 and MiniMax M2-her?

DeepSeek V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek while MiniMax M2-her is developed by MiniMax. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window vs MiniMax M2-her's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 62 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or MiniMax M2-her?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 and MiniMax M2-her each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 62 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V3.1 cost compared to MiniMax M2-her?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens and MiniMax M2-her costs $0.3/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 is $0.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and MiniMax M2-her on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 and MiniMax M2-her across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonLanded Oct 2026
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Muse WonderLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • MiniMax M2-her vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
  • MiniMax M2-her vs MiniMax M3Same lab
  • MiniMax M2-her vs MiniMax M2.7Same lab
  • MiniMax M2-her vs Command A+Same size
  • MiniMax M2-her vs DeepSeek V4 FlashSame size
  • MiniMax M2-her vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same size
  • MiniMax M2-her vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame size

Model pages

  • DeepSeek V3.167 outputs, specs and price
  • MiniMax M2-her67 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed