DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Compare DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, in 3 community votes, qwen3 235b a22b wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 164K vs 33K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Qwen3 235B A22B wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22BWinner
DeepSeek V3.1Runner-up
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B. In 3 blind votes, Qwen3 235B A22B wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 235B A22B particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.1
Input
$0.20
Output
$0.80
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
DeepSeek V3.1 uses 42.3x more hedging
DeepSeek V3.1
Qwen3 235B A22B
53%Vocabulary68%
14wSentence Length9w
0.42Hedging0.00
4.0Bold5.8
3.6Lists3.7
0.02Emoji0.74
0.40Headings0.00
0.22Transitions0.12
Based on 23 + 2 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
