DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Claude Opus 4
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 25 community votes, claude opus 4 wins 86% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 164K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 is the better choice overall, winning 86% of 25 blind community votes on Rival. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 164K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. In community voting, In 25 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 86% of head-to-head duels.
In 25 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 86% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4 leads in Image Generation, Web Design, Analysis. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 25+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Claude Opus 4. In 25 blind votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 86% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude Opus 4 particularly excels in Web Design, Analysis, Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.




