DeepSeek R1 0528
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs o1
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against o1 by OpenAI, context windows of 164K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or o1?
DeepSeek R1 0528 and o1 are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1. Context windows: 164K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and o1
DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while o1 is from openai. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to o1's 128K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $15/M for o1.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
o1Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
93%
o1 uses 39.7x more transitions
DeepSeek R1 0528
o1
64%Vocabulary64%
10wSentence Length16w
0.30Hedging0.76
6.8Bold5.0
4.9Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.00
0.40Headings0.44
0.00Transitions0.40
Based on 4 + 13 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ