DeepSeek R1 vs Z.AI: GLM 4 32B
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against Z.AI: GLM 4 32B by Zhipu AI, context windows of 128K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or Z.AI: GLM 4 32B?
DeepSeek R1 and Z.AI: GLM 4 32B are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for Z.AI: GLM 4 32B. Context windows: 128K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and Z.AI: GLM 4 32B
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is from zhipu. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to Z.AI: GLM 4 32B's 128K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for Z.AI: GLM 4 32B.
Per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both — 5.5× input, 22× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is 22x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji
