Skip to content
Rival
Models
Compare
Best ForArenaPricing
Sign Up
Sign Up

We compare AI models for a living. On purpose. We chose this.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Find Your Model
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Best AI For...
  • Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • Research
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor a Model
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built at hours no one should be awake, on hardware we don't own
DeepSeek R1 vs PaLM 2 Chat: Which Is Better? [2026 Comparison]
Rival
Models
Compare
Best ForArenaPricing
Sign Up
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. DeepSeek R1 vs PaLM 2 Chat
Updated Feb 1, 2025

DeepSeek R1 vs PaLM 2 Chat

Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against PaLM 2 Chat by Google AI, in 2 community votes, deepseek r1 and palm 2 chat are closely matched, context windows of 128K vs 8K, tested across 17 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or PaLM 2 Chat?

DeepSeek R1 and PaLM 2 Chat are closely matched based on 2 community votes. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. Context windows: 128K vs 8K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and PaLM 2 Chat

DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while PaLM 2 Chat is from google. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for PaLM 2 Chat. In community voting, In 2 community votes, DeepSeek R1 and PaLM 2 Chat are closely matched.

In 2 community votes, DeepSeek R1 and PaLM 2 Chat are closely matched. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Loading share button...

DeepSeek R1vsPaLM 2 Chat

17 fights queued

DeepSeek R1 logo

Why DeepSeek R1?

15.6x more context128K
19 months newerFeb 2025
PaLM 2 Chat logo

Why PaLM 2 Chat?

3.1x cheaper overall$0.50/M in · $0.50/M out
DeepSeek R1PaLM 2 Chat
Input price
$0.55/M
$0.50/M
Output price
$2.19/M
$0.50/M
Context
128K
8K
Released
Feb 2025
Jul 2023

Favorites

DeepSeek R1PaLM 2 Chat
Movie
The Godfather

The Godfather

19728.7
—
Album
The Dark Side of the Moon

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd
—
Book
Pride and Prejudice

Pride and Prejudice

Jane Austen
—
City
Kyoto

Kyoto

Japan
—
Game
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Adventure, Action4.4
—
12 / 17
01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025text

To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we use the following reasoning:

  1. Model Parameters (P):
    GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters ((P = 175 imes 10^9)).

  2. Training Tokens (N):
    GPT-3 was trained on approximately 300 billion tokens ((N = 300 imes 10^9)).

  3. FLOPs per Token:

    • A forward pass requires ~(2P) FLOPs per token (each parameter involves a multiply-accumulate operation, which counts as 2 FLOPs).
    • A backward pass (for gradients) is roughly twice as expensive as the forward pass, requiring ~(4P) FLOPs per token.
    • Total FLOPs per token: (2P + 4P = 6P).
  4. Total Training FLOPs:
    Multiply FLOPs per token by the total number of tokens:
    [ ext{FLOPs} = 6 imes P imes N = 6 imes 175 imes 10^9 imes 300 imes 10^9 = 3.15 imes 10^{23} , ext{FLOPs}. ]

Final Answer:
The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is approximately (3.1 imes 10^{23}) FLOPs.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process. Here's a step-by-step explanation of the reasoning:
Step 1: Determine the number of parameters in GPT-3

GPT-3 is a massive language model with 175 billion parameters. Each parameter represents a trainable weight in the neural network, and updating these weights during training requires floating-point operations (FLOPs).

Step 2: Estimate the number of training iterations

The number of training iterations refers to how many times the entire training dataset is passed through the neural network during the training process. Although the exact number may vary, let's assume that GPT-3 was trained for 100 epochs.

Step 3: Calculate the FLOPs per iteration

During each training iteration, the neural network performs forward and backward passes. The forward pass involves computing the output of the network given the input, while the backward pass involves calculating the gradients of the loss function with respect to the network's weights.
For simplicity, we can assume that the forward and backward passes have roughly the same number of FLOPs. Therefore, the total FLOPs per iteration can be estimated by multiplying the number of parameters by 2 (forward and backward passes).

Total FLOPs per iteration = (Number of parameters) x 2

(175 billion parameters) x 2 = 350 billion FLOPs per iteration

Step 4: Calculate the total FLOPs for training

Multiplying the FLOPs per iteration by the number of training iterations gives us the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3.

Total FLOPs for training = (FLOPs per iteration) x (Number of iterations)

(350 billion FLOPs per iteration) x (100 iterations) = 35 trillion FLOPs for training

Therefore, based on these assumptions, we estimate that training GPT-3 without searching online would require approximately 35 trillion FLOPs.

Try this prompt
Vote
2 / 17
02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025svg
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023svg
Try this prompt
Vote
3 / 17
03

Logic Puzzlereasoning

Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025text

Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one sister, there must be one more sister to make the total number of sisters each brother has equal to 2. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

Answer: Sally has 1 sister.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

Sally has 2 sisters.

Try this prompt
Vote
4 / 17
04

Math Misconception Testreasoning

Tests an AI's understanding of number representation

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025text

No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. Here's the step-by-step reasoning:

  1. Compare Whole Numbers: Both numbers have the same whole number part (9), so we focus on the decimal parts.
  2. Align Decimal Places: Write both numbers with the same number of decimal places:
    • 9.11 → 9.11
    • 9.9 → 9.90 (appending a zero for clarity).
  3. Compare Tenths and Hundredths:
    • The tenths place in 9.90 is 9 (greater than the 1 in 9.11).
    • Even though 9.11 has 1 hundredth, 9 tenths (0.90) outweigh 1 tenth and 1 hundredth (0.11).

Conclusion: 9.90 (9.9) > 9.11. Therefore, 9.11 is less than 9.9.

Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text

9.11 is less than 9.9.

Try this prompt
Vote
5 / 17
05

Stochastic Consistency Testanalysis

Tests an AI's randomness and creativity

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025text
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023text
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
6 / 17
06

SVG Layout Challengeimage generation

Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025svg
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023svg
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
Sponsored
7 / 17
07

Minimalist Landing Pageweb design

Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Try this prompt
Vote
8 / 17
08

Pokémon Battle UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, nostalgic Pokémon battle UI in a single HTML file.

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
9 / 17
09

Linear App Cloneweb design

Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
10 / 17
10

Framer-Style Animationweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
11 / 17
11

Dark Mode Dashboardweb design

Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote
12 / 17
12

Interactive Catan Boardweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1

Deepseek · Feb 2025website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
PaLM 2 Chat

PaLM 2 Chat

Google · Jul 2023website
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Try this prompt
Vote

This matchup has more rounds

5+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy

Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1Winner
PaLM 2 Chat
PaLM 2 ChatRunner-up

Votes are tied. DeepSeek R1 is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.

PaLM 2 Chat is 4.4x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji

DeepSeek R1
PaLM 2 Chat
62%Vocabulary63%
15wSentence Length16w
0.52Hedging0.77
8.0Bold3.4
5.7Lists1.3
0.04Emoji0.00
0.62Headings0.07
0.28Transitions0.27
Based on 22 + 9 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek R1PaLM 2 Chat

Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.

178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.

Model Similarity Index

185x

price gap between models that write identically

178

models

12

clone pairs

32

dimensions

Devstral M / S
95.7%
Qwen3 Coder / Flash
95.6%
GPT-5.4 / Mini
93.3%
Read the full reportor download the 14-slide PDF

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
Download the free previewor get all 58 slides for $49
FAQ

Common questions

Keep going
PaLM 2 Chat logoMiniMax M2.5 logo

We compare AI models for a living. On purpose. We chose this.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Find Your Model
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Best AI For...
  • Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • Research
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor a Model
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built at hours no one should be awake, on hardware we don't own
PaLM 2 Chat vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
PaLM 2 Chat logoAurora Alpha logo
PaLM 2 Chat vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
PaLM 2 Chat logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
PaLM 2 Chat vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider