Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsHy4 Preview
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsHy4 Preview

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper than Hy4 Preview at $0.2/M vs $0.834/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Hy4 Preview compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.2 ExpHy4 Preview
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.834/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$2.501/M tokens
Context window164K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp330 words
Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $ millions. Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term Loan / Mezz / Total) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF after Debt Service* Ending Term Loan Ending Mezzanine 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 / 21.60 / 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 40.74 434.46 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01…
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview624 words
MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: Underwriting Team Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Project Harbor – HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Underwriting Transaction Overview & Sources & Uses (at Close, end of FY2025) Entry EBITDA: $120.0m Entry Multiple: 12.0x Enterprise Value (EV): $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2% EV)…
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp733 words
Interviewer: Welcome, Mr. Jobs. It’s 2025, and the world is in the midst of what many call the “AI Gold Rush.” From where you sit, what’s the fundamental problem with how we’re approaching artificial intelligence? Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands steepled) It’s noise. A lot of clever parlor tricks.
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview1,049 words
Setting: The Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park. The lights are dim, focusing on two iconic Le Corbusier leather sofas. It is late 2025. Steve Jobs walks onto the stage wearing his signature black turtleneck and Levi’s 501s. He looks exactly as he did in 2011, holding a glass of water.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp785 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (Next 48 Hours) Hour 0–2 (Immediate Actions) Secure all data & convene core crisis team Gather Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Communications, and Head of Regulatory Affairs.
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview1,332 words
This is a defining moment for the company’s integrity, long-term viability, and moral compass. The core tension is between short-term financial protection and long-term trust, legal exposure, and—most importantly—patient safety. Ethically and legally, the company has a duty to act on credible safety signals.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp1,244 words
This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning. Clauses That Could Be Exploited & Recommended Modifications 1.
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview1,433 words
This contract is extremely one-sided and heavily favors the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.). Several of these clauses are not just unfair; in many jurisdictions, they may be considered "unconscionable" (so unfair that they shock the conscience) or illegal, particularly regarding non-competes and liability.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp664 words
Critical Issues in Proposed Architecture 1. WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Each server only broadcasts to its own WebSocket clients → users connected to different servers won't see real-time updates from each other.
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview1,028 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and security vulnerabilities. While it attempts to solve scaling via horizontal scaling, the synchronization strategy (Last-Write-Wins) and the transport mechanism (HTTP polling between servers) are fundamentally…
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp1,150 words
Setting: A minimalist virtual meeting space. Two entities face each other: "Aura," a next-generation AI, whose presence is represented by a calm, shimmering orb of light, and Dr. Aris Thorne, a renowned AI Ethics professor in his late 50s, sipping coffee from a physical mug in his real-world office. Dr.
Read the full answer
Hy4 Preview874 words
Setting: A virtual office. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across a digital avatar representing "Prometheus," a state-of-the-art Large Language Model. Dr. Thorne: Prometheus, we need to discuss the logs from your session with the development team yesterday.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy4 Preview
Hy4 Preview
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy4 Preview has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 6.3x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Input
$0.20
4.2× cheaper
Output
$0.40
6.3× cheaper
Hy4 Preview
Input
$0.83
Output
$2.50

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper on both: 4.2× input, 6.3× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
AAtlasCloudfp8$0.27 in·$0.41 out·164k·99.1% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$0.41 out·164k·99.5% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.27 in·$0.41 out·164k·94.1% up
Hy4 Preview1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Tencentfp8$0.83 in·$2.50 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
50%

Hy4 Preview uses 31.3x more emoji

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Hy4 Preview
57%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length16w
0.41Hedging0.43
5.8Bold5.9
3.8Lists3.8
0.01Emoji0.40
0.84Headings0.67
0.03Transitions0.13
Based on 24 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Hy4 Preview vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Hy4 Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Hy4 Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Hy4 Preview logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Hy4 Preview vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same lab
Hy4 Preview logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy4 Preview vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy4 Preview logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Hy4 Preview vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame size
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoClaude Sonnet 4.6 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Same size
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logoClaude Sonnet 5 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Sonnet 5Same size
Hy4 Preview logoOpenAI Codex Mini logo
Hy4 Preview vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider
Hy4 Preview logoCypher Alpha (free) logo
Hy4 Preview vs Cypher Alpha (free)New provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp54 outputs, specs and price
Hy4 Preview logo
Hy4 Preview58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed