DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialevsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale at $0.15/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale costs 3.6x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Input
$0.28
Output
$0.42
3.6× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
1.9× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins input (1.9× cheaper)·DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins output (3.6× cheaper)
Where to run it
2 hosts
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 10.4x more emoji
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
48%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length16w
0.91Hedging0.32
3.0Bold5.1
3.5Lists3.9
0.09Emoji0.92
0.56Headings0.75
0.24Transitions0.08
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Seed 2.0 CodeNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Seed 2.0 LiteNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Seed 2.1 TurboNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Sherlock Dash AlphaNew provider