Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialevsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Feb 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialevsQwen3.5 122B A10B

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0.28/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 50 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeQwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price$0.28/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.42/M tokens$3.2/M tokens
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale costs 7.6x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Input
$0.28
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.42
7.6× cheaper
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper on both: 1.4× input, 7.6× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·99.5% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.29 in·$2.40 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.2% upNNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
59%

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale uses 3.2x more hedging

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
48%Vocabulary49%
15wSentence Length15w
0.91Hedging0.29
3.0Bold6.2
3.5Lists4.8
0.09Emoji0.10
0.56Headings0.88
0.24Transitions0.20
Based on 26 + 24 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoOx Alpha logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoMiniMax M3 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGPT-5 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GPT-5New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGLM 4.5 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GLM 4.5New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGLM 4.5 Air logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GLM 4.5 AirNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGLM 4.6 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GLM 4.6New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGLM 4.7 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GLM 4.7New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed