ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Z.ai: GLM 5.2 by Zhipu AI, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 4.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
5.0× cheaper
Output
$1.10
4.0× cheaper
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 4.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
56%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length18w
0.63Hedging0.27
5.3Bold3.7
4.3Lists2.8
0.94Emoji0.00
0.67Headings0.56
0.15Transitions0.24
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
