ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsLing 2.6 1T
Ling 2.6 1T is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.
| Spec | ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B | Ling 2.6 1T |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 123K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Apr 2026 |
Our Verdict
Ling 2.6 1T
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 2.6 1T has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
Output
$1.10
Ling 2.6 1T
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Ling 2.6 1T
56%Vocabulary55%
18wSentence Length17w
0.63Hedging0.33
5.3Bold1.9
4.3Lists4.1
0.94Emoji0.00
0.67Headings0.41
0.15Transitions0.04
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05New provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15New provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20New provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.6 27BNew provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3BNew provider