ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
3.6× cheaper
Output
$1.10
2.7× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 2.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
51%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 6.3x more transitions
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
56%Vocabulary58%
18wSentence Length22w
0.63Hedging0.61
5.3Bold5.7
4.3Lists3.1
0.94Emoji0.63
0.67Headings1.40
0.15Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
