ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is 3.9x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
4.5× cheaper
Output
$1.10
3.9× cheaper
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 4.5× input, 3.9× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
33%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
56%Vocabulary61%
18wSentence Length20w
0.63Hedging0.10
5.3Bold3.7
4.3Lists2.0
0.94Emoji0.01
0.67Headings0.52
0.15Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 29 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
