ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 123K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
Output
$1.10
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
2.5× cheaper
Output
$0.60
1.8× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.5× input, 1.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
75%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 1.7x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
56%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.63Hedging0.37
5.3Bold5.7
4.3Lists4.0
0.94Emoji0.54
0.67Headings0.70
0.15Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
