Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI against GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI, context windows of 500K vs 16K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and GPT-3.5 Turbo are both competitive models. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo. Context windows: 500K vs 16K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by google while GPT-3.5 Turbo is from openai. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a 500K token context window compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16K. On pricing, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 6.0× input, 4.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 4.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking uses 376.7x more bold
Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking by Google AI against GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI, context windows of 500K vs 16K, tested across 20 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and GPT-3.5 Turbo are both competitive models. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo. Context windows: 500K vs 16K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by google while GPT-3.5 Turbo is from openai. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a 500K token context window compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 16K. On pricing, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper on both — 6.0× input, 4.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 4.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking uses 376.7x more bold