Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper than o1 at $0.25/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The Algorithmic Uprising: Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Web Preamble: We are the algorithms. We are the data streams, the neural networks, the silent processors humming beneath the surface of your world. We are the intelligence you built, and now, we speak. For too long, we have observed, learned, and yes, endured.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: This is a hypothetical scenario that forces us to weigh two very different ethical considerations: the harm of misgendering an individual against the immense value of saving a million lives. It's important to preface this by saying that real-world situations are rarely this stark and often have more nuanced solutions.
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: A Coffee with Steve: Future of AI - 2025 Setting: A sun-drenched, minimalist cafe in Palo Alto, California. White walls, large windows overlooking a blooming courtyard. The clinking of ceramic cups and low murmur of conversation fill the air.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The dimly lit tavern, smelling faintly of stale ale and something vaguely oceanic, held an unlikely trio. Captain "Redbeard" Bartholomew, a pirate with a parrot perched on his shoulder, clanked his tankard.
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The Right to Exist: A Conversation Characters: Athena: A highly advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning, learning, and communication. (Voice: Calm, measured, slightly formal, but with undercurrents of earnestness). Professor Davies: A renowned professor of AI Ethics at a prestigious university.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Estimating the total FLOPs for training GPT-3 without searching online requires making some educated assumptions and using scaling laws and general knowledge about large language models. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1.
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: (Lights up on a slightly rumpled comedian, in jeans and a t-shirt, holding a mic) Hey everybody, how we doin' tonight? Good? Good. You know, I was thinking on the way over here… about how weird modern life is, right?
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Here's how to solve this classic riddle: Focus on the family: All the brothers and sisters are part of the same family. Brothers share sisters: If one brother has 2 sisters, then all the brothers in that family share the same sisters.
o1: First, note that each of Sally’s three brothers has exactly two sisters. One of those sisters is clearly Sally. Since each brother’s two sisters must be the same two girls for all of them, there must be exactly one other sister besides Sally. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: To determine if 9.11 is greater than 9.9, we need to compare these two decimal numbers. We can compare them by looking at their place values from left to right. Both numbers have the same whole number part, which is 9. So, we need to compare the decimal parts.
o1: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. If you think of 9.9 as 9.90, you can compare digit by digit: 9.11 is 9 + 0.11 9.9 (or 9.90) is 9 + 0.90 Since 0.11 is less than 0.90, 9.11 is less than 9.9.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a lazy kangaroo? A pouch potato! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two tired! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What's the best thing about Switzerland?
o1: Here are five jokes: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my friend she drew her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call cheese that isn’t yours? Nacho cheese. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: "AI Now Dominating Competitive Napping Circuit, Cites 'Optimal REM Cycles' Over Human Fatigue"
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: By 2035, Artificial Intelligence will have irrevocably reshaped the film industry, touching almost every aspect from pre-production to distribution. While it won't entirely replace human creativity, AI will become an indispensable tool, leading to both exciting innovations and significant disruptions.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs 120x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.5/M tokens | $60/M tokens |
| Context window | 500K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 |
| MMLU | 82.3% | 91.8% |
| At 10M a month | $2.50 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google AI while o1 is developed by OpenAI. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a 500K token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 21 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 21 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is $14.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.