Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) by Google AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) or Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 1049K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) and Llama 4 Maverick

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) is made by google while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) has a 1049K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
82%

Llama 4 Maverick uses 76.4x more hedging

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Llama 4 Maverick
70%Vocabulary42%
11wSentence Length24w
0.00Hedging0.76
4.2Bold3.7
7.3Lists6.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.74
0.00Transitions0.11
Based on 3 + 12 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)Llama 4 Maverick

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions