Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)vsNVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) at $0.04/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | $0.04/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.5/M tokens | $0.16/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | May 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 costs 22x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Input
$0.15
Output
$3.50
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Input
$0.04
3.8× cheaper
Output
$0.16
22× cheaper
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is cheaper on both — 3.8× input, 22× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
31%
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 uses 100.9x more hedging
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2
70%Vocabulary51%
11wSentence Length16w
0.00Hedging1.01
4.2Bold6.3
7.3Lists5.2
0.00Emoji0.06
0.00Headings0.74
0.00Transitions0.22
Based on 3 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 Coder NextNew provider