Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 vs Claude Opus 4

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 by Google AI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 1.0M vs 200K, tested across 11 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 or Claude Opus 4?

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 1049K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 and Claude Opus 4

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is made by google while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 has a 1049K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 costs $0.15/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 is 125x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
79%

Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20
Claude Opus 4
69%Vocabulary64%
10wSentence Length62w
0.26Hedging0.52
1.1Bold4.4
5.5Lists9.1
0.00Emoji0.11
0.00Headings1.87
0.00Transitions0.27
Based on 2 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20Claude Opus 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions