Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 51 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Input
$0.30
Output
$2.50
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
2.7× cheaper
Output
$0.60
4.2× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.7× input, 4.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
52%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 4.0x more emoji
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
53%Vocabulary56%
19wSentence Length14w
0.30Hedging0.37
5.8Bold5.7
3.1Lists4.0
0.14Emoji0.54
0.93Headings0.70
0.22Transitions0.14
Based on 22 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
