Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)vsKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Updated Nov 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)vsKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is cheaper than Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct at $0.175/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) and Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input price$0.175/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$3.5/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Nov 2025
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs 5.8x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Input
$0.17
1.7× cheaper
Output
$3.50
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
Output
$0.60
5.8× cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) wins input (1.7× cheaper)·Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct wins output (5.8× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
48%

Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct uses 37.7x more headings

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
53%Vocabulary63%
14wSentence Length15w
0.38Hedging0.19
4.4Bold5.2
4.1Lists3.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings0.38
0.24Transitions0.05
Based on 7 + 14 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoOx Alpha logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoGPT-4.1 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs GPT-4.1New provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct logoGemini 3 Flash Preview logo
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3 Flash PreviewCross-provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct logoGemini 3 Pro Preview logo
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3 Pro PreviewCross-provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite logo
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteCross-provider
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview logo
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewCross-provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed