Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) by Google AI against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 10 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Input
$0.17
2.3× cheaper
Output
$3.50
1.1× cheaper
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is cheaper on both — 2.3× input, 1.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
46%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
53%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length15w
0.38Hedging0.36
4.4Bold7.0
4.1Lists4.6
0.00Emoji0.34
0.00Headings0.94
0.24Transitions0.09
Based on 7 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
