Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 3 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Input
$0.17
11× cheaper
Output
$3.50
1.7× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) is cheaper on both — 11× input, 1.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
30%
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max uses 191.6x more headings
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max
53%Vocabulary48%
14wSentence Length17w
0.38Hedging0.95
4.4Bold4.3
4.1Lists8.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings1.92
0.24Transitions0.02
Based on 7 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
