Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 43 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
5.0× cheaper
Output
$0.80
2.5× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 2.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 103.6x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
54%Vocabulary55%
15wSentence Length18w
0.35Hedging0.52
5.6Bold6.7
3.9Lists4.3
0.00Emoji1.04
0.39Headings0.92
0.17Transitions0.11
Based on 18 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
