Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)vsGPT-3.5 Turbo
Updated May 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)vsGPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) is cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo at $1.25/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and GPT-3.5 Turbo compared across 40 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input price$1.25/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window—16K tokens
ParametersNot disclosedNot disclosed
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Mar 2022
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 TurboRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs 5.0x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Input
$1.25
1.2× cheaper
Output
$10.00
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.00
5.0× cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) wins input (1.2× cheaper)·GPT-3.5 Turbo wins output (5.0× cheaper)

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google AI Studio$0.63 in·$5.00 out·1M·99.8% upGoogle Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·94.7% up
GPT-3.5 Turbo1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
OpenAI$0.50 in·$1.50 out·16k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
43%

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) uses 62.8x more headings

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
GPT-3.5 Turbo
58%Vocabulary60%
16wSentence Length30w
0.38Hedging0.49
5.8Bold0.3
5.0Lists3.1
0.00Emoji0.00
0.63Headings0.00
0.01Transitions0.20
Based on 16 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GPT-3.5 Turbo logoOx Alpha logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoClaude Opus 4 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Opus 4New provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo logoGrok 3 logo
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Grok 3New provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) logoGPT-4o mini logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs GPT-4o miniCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) logoGPT-5 logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs GPT-5Cross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) logoGPT-5 Codex logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs GPT-5 CodexCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) logoGPT-5 Mini logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs GPT-5 MiniCross-provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed