Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) by Google AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 18 community votes, gemini 2.5 pro (i/o edition) wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 41 shared challenges.
Web Design: Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are tied
Image Generation: Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)Winner
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition). In 18 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) particularly excels in Image Generation. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
18× cheaper
Output
$0.28
35× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 35× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary54%
16wSentence Length14w
0.38Hedging0.12
5.8Bold7.5
5.0Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.68
0.63Headings0.93
0.01Transitions0.12
Based on 16 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
