Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) at $0.071/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Released | May 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) takes Image Generation. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 35x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
18× cheaper
Output
$0.28
35× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 35× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
58%Vocabulary54%
16wSentence Length14w
0.38Hedging0.12
5.8Bold7.5
5.0Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.68
0.63Headings0.93
0.01Transitions0.12
Based on 16 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Qwen3.5 27BCross-provider