Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
18× cheaper
Output
$0.28
35× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 35× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
63%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
51%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length14w
0.31Hedging0.12
4.8Bold7.5
4.1Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.68
0.98Headings0.93
0.05Transitions0.12
Based on 20 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
