Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are both competitive models. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 1049K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by google while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a 1049K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. On pricing, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 35× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
