Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3.8 FlashvsLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Updated Sep 2026

Gemini 3.8 FlashvsLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.59/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) compared across 52 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.8 FlashLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input price$0.75/M tokens$0.59/M tokens
Output price$3.75/M tokens$0.79/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2024
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 3.8 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) costs 4.7x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input
$0.75
Output
$3.75
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
Input
$0.59
1.3× cheaper
Output
$0.79
4.7× cheaper

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) is cheaper on both: 1.3× input, 4.7× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3.8 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.38 in·$1.88 out·1M·96.4% upGoogle AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.8% up
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp8$0.40 in·$0.40 out·131k·92.9% upAmazon Bedrock$0.72 in·$0.72 out·131k·96.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
38%
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)
63%Vocabulary51%
20wSentence Length21w
0.17Hedging0.55
4.0Bold3.0
2.4Lists4.0
0.01Emoji0.00
0.84Headings0.00
0.06Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoOx Alpha logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoMiniMax M3 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs MiniMax M3New provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGPT-5 logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs GPT-5New provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Qwen3.8 MaxNew provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGrok 4.20 Beta logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta logo
Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct) vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed