Gemma 3n 2BvsLing 2.6 1T
Ling 2.6 1T has a larger context window than Gemma 3n 2B (262K tokens vs 8K tokens).
| Spec | Gemma 3n 2B | Ling 2.6 1T |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | Free |
| Output price | Free | Free |
| Context window | 8K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Apr 2026 |
Our Verdict
Ling 2.6 1T
Gemma 3n 2BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Ling 2.6 1T has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 3n 2B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Ling 2.6 1T
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Gemma 3n 2B uses 6.1x more transitions
Gemma 3n 2B
Ling 2.6 1T
49%Vocabulary55%
14wSentence Length17w
0.46Hedging0.33
6.5Bold1.9
6.1Lists4.1
0.00Emoji0.00
0.19Headings0.41
0.23Transitions0.04
Based on 14 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Gemma 3n 2B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.1 ChatNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniNew provider