Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Claude Sonnet 4

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against Claude Sonnet 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 33 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Claude Sonnet 4 are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4. Context windows: 262K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Claude Sonnet 4

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while Claude Sonnet 4 is from anthropic. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to Claude Sonnet 4's 200K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $3/M for Claude Sonnet 4.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Sonnet 4
Claude Sonnet 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Sonnet 4 uses 87.9x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Sonnet 4
58%Vocabulary62%
18wSentence Length111w
0.31Hedging0.40
6.8Bold5.0
3.3Lists9.3
0.00Emoji0.88
0.74Headings2.16
0.15Transitions0.33
Based on 27 + 17 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BClaude Sonnet 4
FAQ