Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5.2

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against GPT-5.2 by OpenAI, context windows of 262K vs 400K, tested across 52 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-5.2?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.2 are both competitive models. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $1.75/M for GPT-5.2. Context windows: 262K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-5.2

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by google while GPT-5.2 is from openai. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window compared to GPT-5.2's 400K. On pricing, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens vs $1.75/M for GPT-5.2.

Our Verdict
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.2 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

GPT-5.2 uses 5.8x more emoji

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
GPT-5.2
58%Vocabulary64%
18wSentence Length16w
0.31Hedging0.34
6.8Bold9.4
3.3Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.06
0.74Headings0.89
0.15Transitions0.31
Based on 27 + 15 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BGPT-5.2
FAQ