What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta AI. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $1.12/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta AI. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

It depends on your use case. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B cost compared to Meta: Muse Spark 1.1?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is $1.12/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1: Which Is Better?

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 11x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

9.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

11× cheaper

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Input

$1.25

Output

$4.25

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 9.6× input, 11× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

61%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

58%Vocabulary61%

18wSentence Length20w

0.31Hedging0.10

6.8Bold3.7

3.3Lists2.0

0.00Emoji0.01

0.74Headings0.52

0.15Transitions0.02

Based on 27 + 29 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Updated Jul 2026

Our Verdict

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 11x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Input

$0.13

9.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

11× cheaper

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Input

$1.25

Output

$4.25

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 9.6× input, 11× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

61%

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B

Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

58%Vocabulary61%

18wSentence Length20w

0.31Hedging0.10

6.8Bold3.7

3.3Lists2.0

0.00Emoji0.01

0.74Headings0.52

0.15Transitions0.02

Based on 27 + 29 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-5New provider

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider