Z.AI: GLM 4 32B vs Z.ai: GLM 5
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4 32B and Z.ai: GLM 5, both from Zhipu AI, context windows of 128K vs 203K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4 32B or Z.ai: GLM 5?
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B and Z.ai: GLM 5 are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens vs $0.8/M for Z.ai: GLM 5. Context windows: 128K vs 203K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4 32B and Z.ai: GLM 5
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is made by zhipu while Z.ai: GLM 5 is from zhipu. Z.AI: GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window compared to Z.ai: GLM 5's 203K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens vs $0.8/M for Z.ai: GLM 5.
No community votes yet. On paper, Z.ai: GLM 5 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is 26x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Z.ai: GLM 5 uses 4.3x more transitions
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
