GLM 4 32BvsGPT-3.5 Turbo
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo at $0.1/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4 32B | GPT-3.5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.1/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Mar 2022 |
Our Verdict
GLM 4 32B
GPT-3.5 TurboRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4 32B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
GLM 4 32B costs 20x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
15× cheaper
Output
$0.10
20× cheaper
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.00
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 15× input, 20× output.
Where to run it
1 host
GLM 4 32B
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
GPT-3.5 Turbo1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
GLM 4 32B uses 35.0x more headings
GLM 4 32B
GPT-3.5 Turbo
55%Vocabulary60%
15wSentence Length30w
0.74Hedging0.49
4.9Bold0.3
3.8Lists3.1
0.00Emoji0.00
0.35Headings0.00
0.04Transitions0.20
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M3New provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-5.6 Luna ProCross-provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-5.6 SolCross-provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-5.6 TerraCross-provider
GLM 4 32B vs GPT-6 AstraCross-provider