Z.AI: GLM 4 32B vs GPT-4o (Omni)
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4 32B by Zhipu AI against GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI, context windows of 128K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4 32B or GPT-4o (Omni)?
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B and GPT-4o (Omni) are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni). Context windows: 128K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4 32B and GPT-4o (Omni)
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is made by zhipu while GPT-4o (Omni) is from openai. Z.AI: GLM 4 32B has a 128K token context window compared to GPT-4o (Omni)'s 128K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens vs $2.5/M for GPT-4o (Omni).
Per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both — 25× input, 100× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Z.AI: GLM 4 32B is 100x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
GPT-4o (Omni) uses 2.5x more emoji
