GLM 4 32B vs Grok 4
Compare GLM 4 32B by Zhipu AI against Grok 4 by xAI, in 2 community votes, glm 4 32b and grok 4 are closely matched, context windows of 128K vs 256K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Web Design: GLM 4 32B and Grok 4 are tied
Our Verdict
Grok 4Winner
GLM 4 32BRunner-up
Votes are tied. Grok 4 has a 256K context window vs 128K — handles longer documents.
GLM 4 32B is 150x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
30× cheaper
Output
$0.10
150× cheaper
Grok 4
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both — 30× input, 150× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
68%
Grok 4 uses 7.0x more emoji
GLM 4 32B
Grok 4
53%Vocabulary53%
15wSentence Length18w
0.83Hedging0.67
5.8Bold2.7
4.6Lists2.7
0.00Emoji0.07
0.35Headings0.86
0.04Transitions0.04
Based on 17 + 21 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
