GLM 4 32BvsMuse Spark 1.3
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 at $0.1/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4 32B | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $1.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.1/M tokens | $4.25/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Sep 2026 |
Our Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3
GLM 4 32BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Muse Spark 1.3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
GLM 4 32B costs 43x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4 32B
Input
$0.10
13× cheaper
Output
$0.10
43× cheaper
Muse Spark 1.3
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
GLM 4 32B is cheaper on both: 13× input, 43× output.
Where to run it
1 host
GLM 4 32B
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Muse Spark 1.31 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
60%
GLM 4 32B uses 2.6x more hedging
GLM 4 32B
Muse Spark 1.3
55%Vocabulary59%
15wSentence Length14w
0.74Hedging0.28
4.9Bold2.6
3.8Lists2.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.35Headings0.48
0.04Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
