Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air by Zhipu AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen, in 10 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 air wins 78% of head-to-head duels, tested across 36 shared challenges.
Web Design: Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 80% of votes
Image Generation: Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 AirWinner
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. In 10 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 78% of the time. That's not luck.
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 1294x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Input
$0.20
Output
$1.10
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
1333× cheaper
Output
$0.001
1294× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both — 1333× input, 1294× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 4.5x more emoji
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
48%Vocabulary57%
16wSentence Length18w
0.40Hedging0.40
5.4Bold5.9
4.8Lists4.8
0.10Emoji0.45
0.75Headings1.07
0.12Transitions0.11
Based on 15 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
