Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.5 AirvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Updated Aug 2025

GLM 4.5 AirvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GLM 4.5 Air at $0.071/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.071/M tokens
Output price$1.1/M tokens$0.285/M tokens
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2025
Our Verdict
GLM 4.5 Air
GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 3.9x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.5 Air
Input
$0.20
Output
$1.10
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
2.8× cheaper
Output
$0.28
3.9× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 2.8× input, 3.9× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.5 Air3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitabf16$0.13 in·$0.85 out·131k·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.14 in·$0.86 out·131k·100% upZ.aifp8$0.20 in·$1.10 out·131k·99.9% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$2.40 out·82k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 2.8x more emoji

GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
50%Vocabulary52%
18wSentence Length15w
0.40Hedging0.20
5.1Bold7.0
4.3Lists4.2
0.32Emoji0.89
0.66Headings0.91
0.09Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.5 Air logoOx Alpha logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoMiniMax M3 logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoAurora Alpha logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok 3 ThinkingNew provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoGrok 4 logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok 4New provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
GLM 4.5 Air logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
GLM 4.5 Air vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed