Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air by Zhipu AI against Qwen: Qwen3 Max by Qwen, in 12 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 air and qwen: qwen3 max are closely matched, context windows of 128K vs 256K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen: Qwen3 Max?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max are closely matched based on 12 community votes. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max. Context windows: 128K vs 256K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is made by zhipu while Qwen: Qwen3 Max is from qwen. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max's 256K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max. In community voting, In 12 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max are closely matched.
In 12 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max are closely matched. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air leads in Web Design, Image Generation, while Qwen: Qwen3 Max leads in Reasoning, Conversation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 12+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Too close to call. Pick based on your use case.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air for Web Design, Image Generation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3 Max for Reasoning, Conversation. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 Max uses 4.6x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
