Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air by Zhipu AI against Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is made by zhipu while Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is from qwen. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking.
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 13.8x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
