What is the difference between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. in 12 community votes on Rival, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.

Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Based on 12 community votes on Rival, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is strongest in Web Design, Image Generation, Conversation.

How much does Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air cost compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $0.05/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 82% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 12 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

What is the difference between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air has a 128K token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. in 12 community votes on Rival, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 54 challenges.

Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Based on 12 community votes on Rival, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is strongest in Web Design, Image Generation, Conversation.

How much does Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air cost compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $0.05/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 82% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 12 votes have been collected for this pair across 54 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Which Is Better?

Updated Sep 2025

Our Verdict

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 AirWinner

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. In 12 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of the time. That's not luck.

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air particularly excels in Image Generation, Conversation, Web Design.

Clear winner

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air

Input

$0.20

Output

$1.10

1.4× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Input

$0.15

1.3× cheaper

Output

$1.50

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

68%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 5.8x more emoji

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

48%Vocabulary54%

16wSentence Length16w

0.40Hedging0.31

5.4Bold6.0

4.8Lists4.5

0.10Emoji0.58

0.75Headings0.88

0.12Transitions0.10

Based on 15 + 17 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs MiniMax M3New provider

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs xAI: Grok 4New provider

Updated Sep 2025

Our Verdict

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 AirWinner

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. In 12 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 82% of the time. That's not luck.

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air particularly excels in Image Generation, Conversation, Web Design.

Clear winner

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air

Input

$0.20

Output

$1.10

1.4× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Input

$0.15

1.3× cheaper

Output

$1.50

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

68%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 5.8x more emoji

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

48%Vocabulary54%

16wSentence Length16w

0.40Hedging0.31

5.4Bold6.0

4.8Lists4.5

0.10Emoji0.58

0.75Headings0.88

0.12Transitions0.10

Based on 15 + 17 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs MiniMax M3New provider

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs xAI: Grok 4New provider