Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air by Zhipu AI against Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Input
$0.20
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.10
2.9× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 2.9× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
75%
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 1.7x more transitions
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
48%Vocabulary49%
16wSentence Length15w
0.40Hedging0.29
5.4Bold6.2
4.8Lists4.8
0.10Emoji0.10
0.75Headings0.88
0.12Transitions0.20
Based on 15 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
