Z.AI: GLM 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 by Zhipu AI against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 16 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 and claude opus 4 are closely matched, context windows of 128K vs 200K, tested across 30 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 or Claude Opus 4?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched based on 16 community votes. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 128K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Claude Opus 4
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is made by zhipu while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. In community voting, In 16 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched.
In 16 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Claude Opus 4 are closely matched. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 leads in Web Design, while Claude Opus 4 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 16+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Too close to call. Pick based on your use case.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 for Web Design. Pick Claude Opus 4 for Image Generation. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is 34x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4 uses 4.3x more sentence length
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.





