Z.AI: GLM 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Z.AI: GLM 4.5 by Zhipu AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 19 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 128K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Z.AI: GLM 4.5 and Llama 4 Maverick

Z.AI: GLM 4.5 is made by zhipu while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.

Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick
Z.AI: GLM 4.5
Z.AI: GLM 4.5Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Z.AI: GLM 4.5Llama 4 Maverick
FAQ