GLM 4.6vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than GLM 4.6 at $0.00015/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 4.6 | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.00015/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.75/M tokens | $0.00085/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GLM 4.6
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4.6 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
GLM 4.6 wins Reasoning and Image Generation. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs 2059x less per token.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 4.6
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.75
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
2667× cheaper
Output
$0.001
2059× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both: 2667× input, 2059× output.
Where to run it
15 hosts, cheapest first
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 3.2x more emoji
GLM 4.6
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
52%Vocabulary57%
16wSentence Length18w
0.31Hedging0.40
5.1Bold5.9
3.2Lists4.8
0.14Emoji0.45
0.54Headings1.07
0.08Transitions0.11
Based on 28 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
GLM 4.6 vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider
GLM 4.6 vs Cypher Alpha (free)New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs DeepSeek V3.1New provider
GLM 4.6 vs DeepSeek Prover V2New provider