Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 4.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Updated Dec 2025

GLM 4.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

GLM 4.7 is the newer model, released after Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.

GLM 4.7 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGLM 4.7Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price—$0.071/M tokens
Output price—$0.285/M tokens
Context window—262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025
Our Verdict
GLM 4.7
GLM 4.7
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
Output
$0.28
Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 4.77 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.40 in·$1.75 out·203k·97.2% upVVenicefp4$0.55 in·$2.65 out·198k·94.1% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.60 in·$2.20 out·200k·99.9% upMMancerfp4$0.70 in·$2.50 out·131k·92.4% upAAtlasCloudfp8degraded$0.52 in·$1.85 out·203k·91.3% upNNovitafp8degraded$0.54 in·$1.98 out·205k·93.9% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
Z.aifp4degraded$0.60 in·$2.20 out·203k·74.8% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$2.40 out·82k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
49%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 8.0x more emoji

GLM 4.7
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary52%
16wSentence Length15w
0.26Hedging0.20
5.4Bold7.0
3.9Lists4.2
0.11Emoji0.89
0.48Headings0.91
0.07Transitions0.10
Based on 23 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
GLM 4.7 logoMiniMax M3 logo
GLM 4.7 vs MiniMax M3New provider
GLM 4.7 logoClaude Sonnet 4 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGPT OSS 20B logo
GLM 4.7 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
GLM 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) logo
GLM 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
GLM 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logo
GLM 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)New provider
GLM 4.7 logoGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental logo
GLM 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed