GLM 5.1vsMuse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $1.25/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.
| Spec | GLM 5.1 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.4/M tokens | $1.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | $4.25/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Sep 2026 |
Our Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3
GLM 5.1Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Muse Spark 1.3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GLM 5.1
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
Muse Spark 1.3
Input
$1.25
1.1× cheaper
Output
$4.25
Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on both: 1.1× input.
Where to run it
16 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 5.115 hosts
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.96 in$3.03 out203k99.8% upStreamLakefp8$0.97 in$3.04 out200k99.6% upDeepInfrafp4$1.05 in$3.50 out203k100% upSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in$3.74 out205k99.9% upCrusoefp8$1.20 in$4.40 out203k99.8% upAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in$3.96 out203k99.6% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
Alibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in$4.18 out203k100% upNovitafp8$1.38 in$4.40 out205k99.7% upFriendli$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.9% upGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.2% upNebiusfp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k90.8% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in$4.40 out203k99.7% upVenicefp8$1.54 in$4.84 out200k93.6% upChutesfp8degraded$0.98 in$3.08 out203k78% upPhaladegraded$1.21 in$4.20 out203k76.7% up
Muse Spark 1.31 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
74%
GLM 5.1 uses 5.8x more transitions
GLM 5.1
Muse Spark 1.3
54%Vocabulary59%
18wSentence Length14w
0.31Hedging0.28
3.6Bold2.6
2.6Lists2.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.43Headings0.48
0.11Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
