Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GLM 5.2vsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 5.2vsGrok 4.7

GLM 5.2 is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $1.4/M vs $1.5999999999999999/M input tokens.

GLM 5.2 and Grok 4.7 compared across 2 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.2Grok 4.7
Input price$1.4/M tokens$1.5999999999999999/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens500K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2026
Our Verdict
GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 5.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 5.2
Input
$1.40
1.1× cheaper
Output
$4.40
1.1× cheaper
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80

GLM 5.2 is cheaper on both: 1.1× input, 1.1× output.

Where to run it

24 hosts, cheapest first

GLM 5.223 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.56 in·$1.80 out·1M·98.8% upSStreamLakefp8$0.64 in·$2.02 out·1M·99.5% upNNovitafp8$0.65 in·$2.04 out·1M·99.9% upDDigitalOcean$0.70 in·$2.20 out·262k·98.1% upCCoreWeavefp4$0.76 in·$2.42 out·1M·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.94 in·$2.95 out·1M·99.8% up
17 more hostsFewer hosts
Alibaba Cloudfp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·1M·99.9% upIInceptronfp4$1.01 in·$3.24 out·1M·98.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.9% upPPhalafp8$1.26 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.2% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·262k·99.9% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upFFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.8% upPParasailfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·262k·99.9% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·512k·99.5% upVVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.6% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.7% upDDecartfp4$2.25 in·$8.00 out·1M·99.8% upAAmbientfp8degraded$0.60 in·$2.00 out·203k·99.1% up
Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·99.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GLM 5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. GLM 5.2 has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 2 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.2 and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 2 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GLM 5.2 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.5999999999999999/M input tokens. GLM 5.2 is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.2 and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GLM 5.2 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoHy3 logo
GLM 5.2 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GLM 5.2 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.2 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.1-Codex-Mini logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniNew provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.2 logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.2New provider
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.2 Chat logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.2 ChatSame size
Grok 4.7 logoGPT-5.2 Pro logo
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-5.2 ProNew provider

Model pages

GLM 5.2 logo
GLM 5.258 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.72 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed